StrinGaze Delivers Up to 21×* Faster Insurance Pricing and Valuation
The unified Actuarial Intelligence Platform — one engine powering both valuation and pricing. Headquartered in Singapore, built for life insurers.
MULTI-FRAMEWORK BY DESIGN
Every major regulatory framework, natively supported
Legacy actuarial platforms were built when overnight batch was acceptable. They aren't anymore.
Up to 21× faster · >50% lower TCO · Headquartered in Singapore · Supports IFRS 17, major RBC frameworks, EV, GAAP and Statutory
Proven across production workloads
Validated at four life insurers between 2025–2026. All speedups normalised to compute-equivalent cores vs the legacy actuarial platform.
Typical 6×–11× faster on production workloads. Up to 21× on IFRS 17.
Speedup grows with portfolio size; parity achieved on 37% fewer cores.
Insurer A
Sub-product engine, full multi-framework
Speedup vs legacy platform
6× to 9×
Insurer B
Major life portfolio, multi-framework parallel run
Speedup vs legacy platform
5× to 21×
Insurer C
RBC + IFRS 17, scales 35K → 200K MPs
Speedup vs legacy platform
6× → 11.8× (grows with MP)
Insurer D
3M MPs, full multi-framework
Speedup vs legacy platform
Same close, 37% fewer cores
Up to 21×
Normalised vs legacy platform across all 5 frameworks
Scales with MP
6× at 35K MPs → 11.8× at 200K MPs (Insurer C)
5M MPs
Largest production portfolio benchmarked
Compute Efficiency
At Insurer D, StrinGaze matched the legacy platform's GAAP and RBC close on 37% fewer cores, and ran EV 1.35× faster on the same fewer-core hardware.
Validated at four life insurers between 2025–2026. Methodology — including normalisation, hardware specs, framework coverage and per-client conditions — available under NDA in technical review.
The next IFRS 17 close is months away. Legacy stacks are running on borrowed time.
Board pressure for faster close cycles. New AI-assisted workflows the incumbents weren't built for. Talent that won't maintain 1990s DSLs. The modernisation window is closing — and the insurers moving now will own the next decade.
- IFRS 17 year-two reporting demands faster, more granular close cycles
- AI-native actuarial workflows require a modern, accessible codebase
- Regulators worldwide are raising the bar on auditability and traceability
“"Speed gains are algorithmic, not hardware-dependent. Infrastructure costs stay flat as workloads scale."
“Insurance decisions have never mattered more — and the tools that produced them have never been more outdated. We're building what should exist.”
What makes StrinGaze different
The speed gains come from three architectural breakthroughs — not just more hardware:
Dynamic Compilation
Analyses each model before execution and maps the optimal computation path automatically.
OmniGraph Technology
Builds a full dependency map to eliminate redundant calculations across complex products.
Core-Affinity Architecture
Restructures data to match CPU cache hierarchies, keeping infrastructure costs flat as workloads scale.
One engine. Every major actuarial workflow.
Valuation and pricing are not separate products — they are workflows on a single unified engine. Same data model. Same assumptions. Same audit trail. No reconciliation. No duplicated logic.
Valuation
Reserving · Embedded Value · Statutory
Pricing
Scenario library · life product types · end-to-end lifecycle
Unified Engine
StrinGaze Projection Engine
Purpose-built compiler · OmniGraph Scheduler · Hardware-optimised
Headquartered in Singapore, built for life insurers — one engine for pricing, valuation, IFRS 17, and ALM.
Engineered for production scale — multi-framework, multi-jurisdiction — anonymised for confidentiality.
One engine. Every valuation cycle.
Performance, accuracy, and reliability — built for the full valuation calendar of monthly and quarterly close, multi-framework reporting, and on-demand impact analysis. Validated against legacy actuarial platforms in parallel-run engagements.
0
Up to, peak — vs. legacy actuarial platforms
0M
Reconciliation against incumbent platforms — framework-by-framework
End-to-End Close Cycle
Legacy IFRS 17 platform
12 hours
StrinGaze
1 hour
Reserve components & fulfilment cash flows
Reporting Frameworks
Contract-group aggregation (CSM, LC, LRC, LIC) handled by separate upper-layer modules — not in scope of the valuation engine.
Performance — Closes in Hours, Not Days
Up to 21× faster than legacy actuarial platforms at peak. Sub-hour single full-portfolio runs protect the close window — adjustments and reruns fit inside the same business day. Same close on up to 37% fewer cores; greater than 50% lower TCO.
Accuracy — 99.9% Reconciliation Against Incumbents
Validated framework-by-framework, product-by-product against the legacy platforms StrinGaze replaces — across IFRS 17, Embedded Value, GAAP, and Statutory. Reproducible across runs — bit-exact, deterministic, with full lineage to every line item.
Reliability — Overnight Calculations, Protected by Design
Validated across a 12-day continuous production stability test — end-to-end reproducible across consecutive close cycles. Cloud-native architecture with dual-centre disaster recovery and self-healing nodes; a hardware fault doesn't take the night with it.
Beyond computation: platform architecture built for enterprise IFRS 17
Multi-Tenant Architecture
Multi-tenant architecture for IFRS 17. Group and subsidiaries share one application with isolated data per tenant. Time-sliced resource allocation locks capacity during month-end close and elastically redistributes during idle periods.
White-Box Traceability
Every intermediate measurement step is persisted and queryable — not just final results. Variable-level dependency graphs make every number auditable to its source. No black-box risk.
Process Compass
Visual month-end workflow automation. Configurable templates per assessment office, automated task orchestration, manual-confirmation checkpoints, and status dashboards. Routine month-end tasks run automatically; reviewer sign-off remains in actuarial control.
Out-of-Box pricing scenarios.
A library of configurable pricing scenarios for major life insurance product families — covering the end-to-end product lifecycle from design to compliance. Calibrated for major reporting frameworks, governed by design.
100×+
Faster than Excel — IUL pricing benchmark, profit testing rebase 276h → 11m 40s
3
Product Management Workflow scenarios — Workflow Setup, Word Document Management, AI Compliance Check
7
Pricing module scenarios — calibrated for major reporting frameworks across the full pricing lifecycle
From idea to filing-ready, on the same platform.
The Product Management Workflow and Pricing modules together cover the full lifecycle — idea generation through documentation and filing, governed and auditable at every stage. The internal lifecycle compressed from 3–4 months to under 1 month.
Documentation & filing built in: actuarial working papers, rate manuals, benefit illustrations, and regulatory filing packages — auto-generated from the model. What used to take weeks of manual Excel/Word assembly now runs in minutes.
Internal product development cycle, excluding regulatory filing.
What Excel structurally cannot do, in under 12 minutes.
1,000 model points, 158× rebase profit testing on an IUL pricing model. Excel can run a single iteration but cannot orchestrate iterative rebasing at scale — every reset is manual, every version-control break is a reconciliation. StrinGaze runs the whole sequence unattended.
Excel (manual cycle, reset overhead)
276 hours
StrinGaze (single core, unattended)
11 min 40s
Benchmarked on an indexed-credit life policy with iterative profit-test rebasing — 41-year-old policyholder, benefit covered to age 120. The Excel figure includes the manual reset and version reconciliation work that rebasing at this scale requires. Source: client benchmark.
The major life insurance product families — including participating, indexed, and unit-linked structures — already configurable out of the box. Edge cases and novel structures handled through configuration.
Plus Par bonus methods: Reversionary, Terminal, Cash Dividend, Paid-Up Addition (PUA).
100% At our pilot pricing deployment, the full Excel-native pricing team onboarded to StrinGaze — Excel is now only used for parallel validation, not as the source of truth.
Built for how actuarial teams actually work in 2026
See the engine, before you commit.
A live technical deep-dive with our engineering team — our architecture, our benchmarks, our reconciliation methodology. Your team's questions, our team's answers, no data exchange required at this stage.
Frequently asked questions
Performance data based on client benchmarks. Results may vary by model complexity and hardware. All client identities anonymised.
Go deeper
Explore the vision, team, and architectural thinking behind StrinGaze.